JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 30, 2005

A- de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Hernando Aldana Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Incidente De Desacato De La Sentencia T-025/04 Promovido Ante La Corte Constitucional. La Corte Constitucional Carece De Competencia Para Resolver Los Incidentes De Desacato Interpuestos Para El Cumplimiento De Las Ordenes Impartidas. Rechazado Por Improcedente
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Corte Constitucional
  • No tiene competencia para lograr el cumplimiento de órdenes puntuales a favor de la población desplazada
Cumplimiento Fallo De Tutela
  • Corresponde al juez de primera instancia y por excepción a Salas de Revisión de la Corte Constitucional
Derechos De Los Desplazados
  • Ordenes impartidas en sentencia T-025/04
Incidente De Desacato
  • Competencia de juez Civil del Circuito para el cumplimiento de órdenes impartidas en sentencia T-025/04
Juez De Primera Instancia
  • Competencia para conocer incidente de desacato en sentencia T-025/04
5 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. RECHAZAR por improcedente la solicitud de iniciar incidente de desacato promovida por Hernando Aldana y otros.
  2. Segundo. INFORMAR a Hernando Aldana y demás peticionarios que el juez competente para conocer del incidente de desacato de las órdenes puntuales impartidas en la sentencia T-025 de 2004 es el Juzgado
  3. Cuarto. Civil del Circuito de Bogotá.
  4. Comuníquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.